Order (Auto)March 13, 1997

A- de 1997

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

✓Claimant Narvaez Ceron Eduardo·Respondent Carmen Enelia Narvaez Ojeda

✓

Topic · hard data

Nulidad Por Falta De Notificacion.

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Acción De Tutela

Fundamento en acervo probatorio

Nulidad Por Falta De Notificacion De Tutela

Iniciación de la acción y fallo

2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index

Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Se declaró la nulidad de la providencia proferida por el Juzgado de la referencia debido a la falta de notificación a la parte demandada, en virtud de garantizar el debido proceso la Corte ordenó remitir el expediente de tutela al mencionado Juzgado para que notifique esta providencia a las partes y adelante el proceso en debida forma.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)

Primero. Declarar LA NULIDAD de la providencia proferida por el Juzgado
Quinto. Penal del Circuito de Pasto, el dos (2) de octubre de mil novecientos noventa y seis (1996).
SEGUNDO. REMITASE el expediente de tutela No. T-113.004 al Juzgado
Quinto. Penal del Circuito de Pasto, para que notifique esta providencia a las partes y adelante el proceso en debida forma.

Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Appears in the rulingN1 · hard data

Vladimiro Naranjo Mesa

Magistrado

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it

constitutional review unification tutela

Cites2

T-018/94Derecho De Peticion. Pension De Jubilacion. I.S.S. Concedida.T-570/93Derecho De Peticion. Pension De Jubilacion. Caja Nal De Prevision. Concedida.

Cited by2

C-016/13Facultades Extraordinarias En Materia De Publicidad De La Actividad Contractual Del Estado A Traves De Mecanismos Electronicos. Exequibilidad T-1274/08Tutela of 2008

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.